User talk:Kodia

Missing Z's!
Kodia, it an location is missing a middle (z) coordinate, don't put a 0 in the template. The template automatically assumes 0 when it renders the page AND it links the article to this category which is intended to help editors identify articles that need z-coordinates added so they can be looked up and added. I've undone your edits for the pages that were on my watchlist, but I'm sure there are many more that you did changed too. --Sage Locano Aredium (talk/contribs) 18:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * A great many of those changes were for locations at sea level, making the Z coordinate 0 for water level. As most of the water-area z coordinates that are under water do poorly with the tracking wisp, those coordinates were perfectly valid methods of updating locations to an identifiable area for a player to traverse to. I did have method to my madness.--Kodia 19:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 0 is not always sea level, just for the record. --Uberfuzzy 19:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know but the wisps/glowy trails have a historically bad time working underwater.--Kodia 19:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

timelines
checking... --Uberfuzzy 01:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * not sure why it was breaking, but then again, the whole ibox thing and the timelines is still one thing i'm trying to unravel.
 * if that happens again, check the timeline template
 * to
 * nfi --Uberfuzzy 01:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * nfi --Uberfuzzy 01:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * nfi --Uberfuzzy 01:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Misc. Random Spell Drops
Ah, I know folks would put the individual ones, but I didn't know it was you that put the 'random' one there. I think it's kinda clunky, since the adepts and such are "standard loot" -- loot that pretty much any mob that drops loot can drop (based on it's level, of course). I figured that was assumed... perhaps we can come up with something like Standard Loot that leads to a page describing how it can be any level-appropriate adept or recipe book. -Lordebon 06:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's certainly another idea. Why don't we see if we can get some sort of consensus on it and see what we can come up with. Maybe we can get some other people to comment.--Kodia 12:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)